集体主义，“没有”个人隐私；个人，也绝不能凌驾于集体之上。这便是为什么：“多数”国人，可以随意侵犯其ta“少数”，而又不遭受强烈惩罚，还自得其乐的，根髓和原因。
个人的“面子丢失”，事小；集体的伟、光、正（伟大、光荣、正确），才最大。这本质上是，“集体主义”站在“道德至高点”对个人实施精神控制（PUA）的一种行为。
其对应的则是：“人文主义”。
比对和分析。前者的出现，是为了抵御“大的风险”，比如灾害、战争等。后者，则是，为了释放个人“无限”的潜能。各自优缺点亦甚是分明。
- 前者：集体＞个人，集体抵抗风险的能力强，个人处于弱势的一个地位。
- 后者：强调个人，集体也需要征询个人的见意，抵抗风险的能力较弱。
两者“相遇”，产生的所有相关问题，需要得到解决的关键，在于处理好它们之间的一个平衡。不是意识之争，而是共存与互补的一个关系。
&
Collectivism, "No" individual privacy; the individual must not be above the collective. This is why: the root and reason why the "Majority" Chinese people can violate other "Minority" people at will, without being severely punished, and still enjoying themselves.
Individual "Loss of Face" is a small matter; collective greatness, glory, and correctness are the biggest. This is essentially an act of "collectivism" standing on the "Moral Supreme Point" and implementing mind control (PUA) over individuals.
Its counterpart is: "Humanism".
Compare and analyze. The appearance of the former is to resist "Big Risks", such as disasters and wars. The latter, on the other hand, is to unleash individual's "Infinite" potential. The advantages and disadvantages of each are also very clear.
- The former: Collective>Individual, the collective ability to resist risks is strong, and the individual is in a weak position.
- The latter: Emphasizes the individual, the collective also needs to consult the opinions of the individual, and the ability to resist risks is weak.
The key to solving all the related problems arising from the "meeting" of the two is to handle a balance between them. It is not a struggle of consciousness, but a relationship of coexistence and complementarity.
2022.11.03 02.42
随笔｜Notes
理丠