@理丠-Lǐ_Qiū

——(不是谁的英雄,不过自我意识的奴隶)「Not Someone's Hero, but a Slave of Self-consciousness」

隐私政策|Privacy Policy作品集|Works关于作者|About Author

分类|Category:

发布|Posted:

集体主义和人文主义|Collectivism & Humanism


集体主义“没有”个人隐私个人,也绝不能凌驾于集体之上。这便是为什么:“多数”国人,可以随意侵犯其ta“少数”,而又不遭受强烈惩罚,还自得其乐的,根髓和原因

  • Collectivism, "No" individual privacy; the individual must not be above the collective. This is why: the root and reason why the "Majority" Chinese people can violate other "Minority" people at will, without being severely punished, and still enjoying themselves.

个人的“面子丢失”,事小集体的伟、光、正(伟大、光荣、正确),才最大。这本质上是,“集体主义”站在“道德至高点”对个人实施精神控制(PUA)的一种行为

  • ​Individual "Loss of Face" is a small matter; collective greatness, glory, and correctness are the biggest. This is essentially an act of "collectivism" standing on the "Moral Supreme Point" and implementing mind control (PUA) over individuals.

其对应的则是:“人文主义”

  • Its counterpart is: "Humanism".

比对和分析。前者的出现,是为了抵御“大的风险”,比如灾害、战争等。后者,则是,为了释放个人“无限”的潜能。各自优缺点亦甚是分明。

  • Compare and analyze. The appearance of the former is to resist "Big Risks", such as disasters and wars. The latter, on the other hand, is to unleash individual's "Infinite" potential. The advantages and disadvantages of each are also very clear.

前者:集体>个人,集体抵抗风险的能力强,个人处于弱势的一个地位

  • The former: Collective>Individual, the collective ability to resist risks is strong, and the individual is in a weak position.

后者:强调个人集体也需要征询个人的见意,抵抗风险的能力较弱。

  • The latter: Emphasizes the individual, the collective also needs to consult the opinions of the individual, and the ability to resist risks is weak.

两者“相遇”,产生的所有相关问题,需要得到解决的关键,在于处理好它们之间的一个平衡不是意识之争而是共存与互补的一个关系

  • The key to solving all the related problems arising from the "meeting" of the two is to handle a balance between them. It is not a struggle of consciousness, but a relationship of coexistence and complementarity.

2022.11.03 02.42
随笔|Jottings
理丠

更新|Modified:

联系|Email

抖音,今日头条,微信公众号TikTokTwitter,Instagram

——(知识共享:署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎)「CC BY-NC-ND」

©理丠