npub1hjmeql8n5zx93fcyftre8v38ksg0frxyzfattg2h6sdqvu675sysl7p5pp

@理丠-Lǐ_Qiū

作者|Author——(不是谁的英雄,不过自我意识的奴隶)「Not Someone's Hero, but a Slave of Self-consciousness」

@理丠-Lǐ_Qiū

关于作者|About Author作品集|Works隐私政策|Privacy Policy

网易新闻2022年度盘点|NetEase News 2022 Annual Inventory


链接|Link(维基百科|Wikipedia)

有的辩解人士说:没有加上“放开”后的情况。​个人想说的是,放开前的情况,即使是少部分都会选择“夹”,放开后的“更会”。“变相打自己脸”,没人会蠢到这个地步。

很多人则是说:没有宏观讲好的。那么问题来了,“新华社”等官方媒体,哪怕有一个讲“不好的”么?

​没有对错。屁股,决定“坐姿”的一个问题。

Some defenders said that the situation after "Release" was not added. What I personally want to say is that before Release, even a small number of situations would be "Banned", and after Release, will "be more". "Slap oneself in the face in disguise", no one was so stupid.

Many people say: there is no good macroscopic talk. So here comes the question, "Xinhua News Agency" and other official media, even if there is one who says "bad"?

​No right or wrong. A problem that buttocks determine the "Sitting Posture".


更新|Modified:

本站仅提供信息参考,不负任何责任。(This Site Provides Information for Reference Only, Do Not Take Any Responsibility.)——免责声明|Disclaimer

@理丠-Lǐ_Qiū

授权——(知识共享:署名/链接地址,非商业性使用,禁止演绎)「CC BY-NC-ND」4.0

©理丠-Lǐ_Qiū

LNURL1DP68GURN8GHJ7MR9VAJKUEPWD3HXY6T5WVHXXMMD9AKXUATJD3CZ7K2PFPUKKKQ8K9WX8